|
Notices |
Way Off Topic For non-Foster's-related *discussions* (not spam). Posts that are religious, sexual, or political in nature will be heavily moderated. Please keep it clean! |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
05-03-2007, 06:07 PM | #11 |
Holy Toledo!
|
See, but I still think there's a huge difference. We both know not all pit bulls are bred solely as weapons in fact most of them aren't. There are bred to be the companions and oftentimes protectors of families individuals. Someone being denied the companionship of a wonderful dog is a lot worse than someone being denied ownership of a semi-automatic weapon.
I'm not advocating for a gun-free world, it's just that some of the guns being argued for are just uneccessary. I'm not going to name any because, really I'm nowhere near as educated in the subject as say, Partymember. But even to us "morons" there are some guns that do seem a little, well, overkill. All law-abiding citizens who so choose, by right should be allowed to carry a firearm. So don't put me down as one alarmist crybaby. But still this right is far and away from a dog. A dog is a friend. A dog you can love. A dog you can grow up with, share your feelings with, and bring out certain emotions in people. A gun is just an inanimate object. So, yes I see your intention, I get the parallel, but it really seems like an apples and oranges deal. Oh, man. I should've phrased this whole thing better. I'm apologizing in advance for anything that sounded harsh. I didn't mean to come off that way. |
05-03-2007, 06:57 PM | #12 | |
super-scientist
GO TEAM VENTURE!
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Lake George
Posts: 1,500
|
Quote:
No appologies necessary. It does require some explaning. Criminals will still have guns even when a law banning them is in place. Look at the cities. Gangs still roam the streets with full-auto machineguns, yet they're illegal. Since the criminals already have all the guns they need/want to commit crimes with, why not let the civilians have guns? I would feel much safer if i saw a full-auto AK-47 in the gun rack of every car. Much safer. If a criminal is going to rob a house, rape the woman inside, then kill her, is he really going to not use a machinegun because that gun is illegal? Kind of silly to expect that, isn't it?
__________________
Think you used enough dynamite there, Butch?
|
|
05-03-2007, 07:09 PM | #13 |
Holy Toledo!
|
I could never carry an arm unless I was in an extreme situation. To be perfectly frank, I don't trust myself with a weapon. Not that I'm unstable, it's just that I have a short temper, and sometimes suffer from poor judgement.
But I see your point. But I think people should have just as much of a right to not carry an arm as to not carry. I also don't really believe in concealed carry. I think crime would go way down if at least one of the arms people were carrying were visible. People would think twice about stealing from the lady on the corner if they know right off that bat that she's packing. |
05-03-2007, 07:49 PM | #14 |
Banned
THE REFORMER...
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: The Spam Board
Posts: 910
|
-__-
I love pitbulls.... and terriers.... and kids!! ...THIS REALLY SUCKS!!! That is... one... special little dog... |
05-04-2007, 04:36 PM | #15 | |
super-scientist
GO TEAM VENTURE!
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Lake George
Posts: 1,500
|
Quote:
When i move to VT for college i'm carrying a Colt 1911 .45 in a chest rig off-campus. The police style ones in leather, they have the holster on your left and a double mag pouch on your right. Can't wait!
__________________
Think you used enough dynamite there, Butch?
|
|