![]() |
Pixar Movie that you would like to see a sequel the most
Since Toy Story has spawned one sequel & 2 in early stages, I think it's safe for everyone to not include TS.
1. The Incredibles-The cliffhanger ending leaves there no reason for no sequel 2.Cars 3.Monster's Inc. 4.Finding Nemo- No idea how they would do it though 5. A Bug's Life |
yeah finding nemo and a bugs life were the only ones i can think of right now id like to see a sequel from in terms of pixar.
|
A Bug's Life, but I'm pretty sure I heard there definately won't be one.
|
The Incredibles has the most sequel potential by far... though (mini-rant time) I honestly don't understand why everybody believes the ending was a cliffhanger; I think it was simply meant as an exciting ending that shows the Parr family working as one. Nothing against the Underminer or his fans, but I think a sequel should have a more solid basis than a random villain who apparently has no emotional connection to the heroes. And isn't there already a videogame based on the heroes taking on Underminer?
I can't imagine any "screaming to be made" sequels to the other films listed. I hope Toy Story 3 will live up to the Pixar pedigree. |
Actually, I'd like to see some good movies LEFT. ALONE. D:<
|
I trust Pixar, though. Even as a child back when Toy Story 2 came out, I was stunned at how it was EVEN BETTER than the original.
|
Finding Nemo 2: Where'd That Little Guy Get To This Time?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Plus the Pixar crew (John Lasseter, Andrew Stanton, Brad Bird,etc...) afre now apart of Disney since they bought Pixarso it should atleast live up toTS1 & 2. Why no Bug's Life 2, Sparky? Last time I checked it's still one of the top 100 grossing films of all time. |
Monsters, Inc. I finally saw the original late last year and loved it. :)
|
Quote:
|
Monsters Inc.
the Incredibles :frankiesmile: |
The Incredibles could really work with a sequel. As long as the villins stay fresh or the story stays charming than a sequel could work.:D Oh, and the ending to the Incredibles was, in my opinion, to show that the superheros were welcomed back into society again.
|
Quote:
There was going to be a sequel!!??:'( |
Hey, Disney pretty much always considers sequels and series when they release movies these days. :terrsmile: They just don't always get made. Yes there was going to be a sequel, I forget now if the plot had been released. I've been out of the ABL fandom a long time now.
|
The only time Disney has made sequels has been in regarding those half assed, cheaply produce craptacular home video sequels of virutally EVERY movie they ever created. Right down to Cinderella, Fox and the Hound, and Little Mermaid.
The ONLY ones i ever enjoyed were Aladdin's sequels and Lion King 2, simply because I LOVE Lion King and that was the first direct video sequel they made before they were pumped out like nerf balls. Toy Story IS getting a sequel tho. I've heard this a couple times on movie websites, but after buying Pixar, Disney is planning to do another Toy Story sequel and as far as I know, both Tim Allen and Tom Hanks will return to play the voices of Woody and Buzz again. I'm kinda saddened to hear this simply because that means Slinky dog will have to be recast because his voice actor Jim Varney (R.I.P.:() died years ago. I know he wasn't a major character in the film series but I still liked him alot. Last I heard, the "original version" of the plot was supposed to be about a toy recall on all the Buzz Lightyear dolls because of some kind of defect. As such, Buzz is taken back to Japan where he was made and the toys have to go to Japan to get him back and meet LOTS of weird new toys along the way. |
I'm not sure...one of the great things about Pixar films is that they're usually structured more around the emotional journey and developing relationships of a character or group of characters, as opposed to "a bunch of guys having crazy adventures". If you go back and make an unnecessary sequel, you often have to unpick the conclusion of the previous film and cheapen its emotional closure, something that would be quite harmful to something like Finding Nemo or Monsters. Inc, which had quite poignant endings.
A good sequel would find ways to find different emotional issues to explore with the same characters and universe, developing the charcters further, show different sides to them without undermining what you established in the original, something that Toy Story 2 accomplished wonderfully. Could they do it again? Perhaps; the universe and characters of The Incredibles seems diverse enough to make a good sequel, and I think another Toy Story might work, so long as it's one Pixar want to make, not one Disney's finance department want to make. Anything else is pushing it, I think, but hey, maybe Pixar could prove me wrong again... |
The Incredibles.
|
I REALLY need to sit myself down and watch Toy Story II, I've only heard good things about it but I never took the time to watch it.
|
Quote:
|
Toy Story 2 used to be my all-time favorite film ever for a while, and it's still one of the most wonderful films ever made. SEE IT NOW. :frankiesmile:
|
TS 2 is so much better than TS 1. The Buzz defect TS 3 has (I think) been scrapped. John Lasseter (head Pixar guy & director of both TS movies) should hopefully have control fo this sequel, he's a Disney guy now.
|
I'll say Monster's Inc.
I haven't even seen half of the Pixar stuff, so that is the one I'd choose. :D |
A Bug's Life needs a sequel. BADLY.
|
monster inc
the ending felt like cliffhanger |
Quote:
|
And it was a very sweet cliffhanger to boot.:frankiesmile:
|
I wanna see a sequel to cars cuz that is definetly the best one yet!!!!
|
Yeah it was sweet. But I have doubts about a sequel, no one would be on Randall's side unless soemone already killed him. *Gets shot by all the Randall fans on Fanfic.net&
|
If they ever make Monster's Inc 2, I won't be surprised if they have Randall turn good to please his many fans and sympathizers. It wouldn't be the first time a Disney baddie turned good. :D
|
Quote:
Correct me if I am wrong here. |
When else? ???
|
Quote:
Oh and BTW you can add Finding Nemo to that list, (Marlin's Wife and most of his unborn kids, at the beginning of the film.) |
:terrconf: I always thought Randall somehow escaped and went off on his own. He's pretty sneaky and clever, you know.
|
Quote:
pitbulllady |
Monsters Inc was on Christmas Day here. I didn't see all of it but is true Randall is so popular? I'll say this for him he was beautifully animated and moved very nicely. That was true of most of the monsters but those pixar movies really fall down with the human characters. They look stiff and dead to me, especially the Princess in Shrek when she's not an ogre.
Anyway to keep with the actual thread I'll say Monsters Inc as it was funny and well made. Randall would have to be in it, probably plotting revenge, as it seemed to me that unless the BBC cut a bit he wasn't killed. He was just getting a good sorting out. |
Quote:
I'm hoping that you're right, in that he was just getting a "good sorting out", as you put it, or as we'd say here in the US, an "attitude adjustment"-getting some sense knocked into that hard head, a proverbial Blinding Light on the Road to Damascus, in Biblical terms. With some people, that's what it takes to set them straight. The reason, though, that I think Pixar wanted viewers to believe he got killed is because that scene took place in southern Louisiana, the people in the trailer thought he was a "gator", and alligator meat is dietary staple in Louisiana, so we're supposed to believe that he was killed and EATEN by those people. pitbulllady |
hoo boy is gator good. I love that stuff!
Monster's Inc. deserves a good sequel, not one of the pathetic ones like Disney has taken a fancy to of late. |
Would you count Sid (that bully) blowing up one of the toys as "death" in Toy Story? I would, since toys came to life on the TS films.
|
I'm not going to go too deep into this whole Randall situation since I got skid marks from the last time I delved too deep into this. But I never and I do mean NEVER found him to be the type to be good or change his ways and all that kind of stuff.
Randall was a villain and at times, I found him to be a more villainous villain then even the head bad guy, Waternoose. I don't think he's a nice guy and I don't think he would change his ways, I also REALLY doubt that he survived his little bayou encounter. The odds of those people throwing a man sized monster after slamming it's head in a few times back into the closet from where it came from is unlikely. Realistically, if I were them I'd kill it if something like that came out of my closet. No offense to Randall's army of fans but like I said, being realistic. Taranchula is right on the fact that despite Disney's kid nature, they are not afraid to have people die. Syndrome and Hopper both died in their films, and that's not even counting the large amounts of VIOLENT deaths in the original animated Disney films. Some of their classics have serious gory demises. The Little Mermaid The Lion King Tarzan The Great Mouse Detective Sleeping Beauty The Rescuers Downunder The Hunchback of Notre Dame Lady and the Tramp All of these films showed death, violence, and some had extremely dark and mature material to work with. Disney is not afraid to kill it's villains or some of it's characters. Of course, you'll notice Disney's favorite method of "villain removal" is dropping them off a cliff or very high ledge or something. Dying from heights is a common Disney villain death because it's an easy way to kill someone without showing you the nasty after affect. Even though, like I said, Disney has showed some pretty dark stuff at times. |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:50 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.